Szemészet, 2016 (153. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)

2016-06-01 / 2. szám

Evisceratio, enucleatio elvégzésének indikációja, kontraindikációja műszemmel lehet a volumenvesz­teséget pótolni, ami rontja az esz­tétikai rehabilitáció esélyeit. Ha enucleatio és evisceratio műtét elévgézésre kényszerülünk a beteg számára csak orbita-implantátum beillesztésével lehet a megfelelő esz­­tétiakai rehabilitációt biztosítani. Enucleatio esetén intraorbitalis, evis­ceratio során intrascleralis implantá­tumot használunk. Az implantátu­­mok használata megelőzi a postenuc­­leatiós szindróma kialakulását, bizto­sítja a műszem megfelelő helyzetét és mozgóképességét (12-13. ábra). RQ DALOM 1. Abel AD, Meyer DR. Enucleation With Primary Implant Insertion for Treatment of Recalcitrant Endophthalmitis and Panophthalmitis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 21: 220-226. 2. Adenis JRCamezind R Petit B, Pilon E Robert PY, et a I. Bone for­ mation in hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate ceramic implants used in the treatment of the postenucleation socket syndrome. Orbit 2003; 22: 183-1Э1. 3. Aguilar GL, Shannon GM, Flanagan JC. Experience With Dermis-Far Frafting: Complication and Methods of Prevention. Ophthal Surg 1982; 13: 204-209. 4. Allen JH, Allen LA. Buried Muscle Cone Implant. Arch Ophthalmol 1951; 43: 879-890. 5. Alwitry A, West S, King J, Foss AJ, Abercrombie LC. Long-term Follow-up of Porous Polyethylene Spherical Implants After Enu­cleation and Evisceration Ophthlmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2007; 23(1): 11-15. 8. Anderson RL, Yen MT, Lucci LM, Caruso RT. The Quasi-Integrated Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 18: 50-55. 7. Araki К, Maki К, Seki К, Sakamaki К, Harata Y, et al. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): system configuration and physical pro­perties. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 51-59. 8. Berens C, King JH. An Atlas of Ophthalmic surgery. JB Lippincott Company Philadelphia-Montreal: 1981. P 582-597. 9. Bigham WJ, Stanley R Cahill JM, Curran RW, Perry AC. Fibrovas­­cular ingrowth in porous implants: the effect of material com­position, porosity, growth factors, and coatings. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 5: 317-25. 10. Blaydon SM, Shepler TR, Neuhaus RW, White WL, Shore JW. The Porous Polyethilene (Medpor) Spherical Orbital Implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 19: 364-371. 11. Bosniak SL, Nesi E Smith BC, Schechter B, Cote R. A Comparision of Motility: Autogenous Dermis-Fat vs Synthetic Spherical Implants. Ophthal Surg 1989; 20: 889-891. 12. Bryant JA, Drage NA, Richmond S. Study of the scan uniformity from an Í-CAT cone beam computed tomography dental imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 365-374. 13. Buettner H, Bartley GB. Tissue Breakdown and Exposure Assotiated With Orbital Hydroxyapatite Implants. Am J Opthalmol 1992; 113: 669-673. 14. Bullock JD. Autogenous dermis.fat „baseball'' orbital implant. Ophthal Surg 1987; 18: 30-36. 15. Cepela M, Teske S. Orbital Implant Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1996; 7: 38-42. 16. Chalasini R, Poole-Warren L, Conway RM, Ben-Nissan B. Porous Orbital Implants in Enucleation A Systematic Review. Surv Oph­thalmol 2007; 52: 145-155. 17. Christmas NJ, Gondon CD, Murray TG, Tse D, Johnson T, et al. Intraorbital Implants After Enucleation an Their Complications a 10-Year Review. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: 1199-1203. 18. Choyce DP Orbital Implants. Br J Ophthalmol 1952; 36: 123-130. 19. Chuo JY, Dolman PJ, Ng TL, Buffam FV, White VA. Clinical and Histo­pathologic Review of 18 Explanted Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implants. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 349-354. 20. Colén TR Paridaens DA, Lemij HG, Mourits MR van den Bosch WA. Comparison of Artifitial Eye Amplitudes with Acrylil and Hydro­xyapatite Spherical Enucletion Implants. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 1889-1894. 21. Custer PL, Trinkaus KM. Volumetric Determination of Enucleation Implant Size. Am J Ophthalmol 1999; 128: 489-494. 22. Custer PL, Trinkaus KM, Fornoff J. Comparative Motility of Hydro­xyapatite and Alloplastic Enucleation Implants. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 513-516. 23. Custer PL. Enucleation: Past, Present, and Future. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 16: 316-321. 24. Custer PL, Kennedy RH.Woog JJ, Kaltreider SA, Meyer DR. Orbital Implants in Enucleation. Surgery. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 2054-2061. 25. Custer PL, McCaffery S. Complication of Sclera-Covered Enucleation Implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 22: 269-273. 26. Custer PL, Trinkaus KM. Porous Implant Exposure: Incidence, Management, and Morbidity. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 23: 1-7. 27. Cutler NL. A positive contact ball and ring implant for use after enucleation. Eighty-First Annual Meeting of the American Ophthal­­mological Society 1945 nov 12. 28. De Potter R Shields CL, Shields JA, Singh AD. Use of the Hydro­xyapatite Ocular Implant int he Pediatric Population. Arch Oph­thalmol 1994; 112: 208-212. 29. De Potter R Duprez T, Cosnard G. Postconstrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implant (Medpor). Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 1656-1660. 30. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen G. Cone-Beam computerised tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38: 609-625. 31. Detorakis E, Drakonaki E, Papadaki E, Pallikaris IG, Tsilimaris MK. Effective Orbital Volume and Eyeball Position: An MRI Study. Orbit 2010; 29: 244-249. 32. Deveci M, Özürk S, Sengezer M, Pabu Y. Measurement of orbital volume by a 3-dimensional software program: An Experimental study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58: 645-648. 33. Dresner SC, Karesh JW. Primary Implant Placement with Evisce­ration in Patuients with Endophthalmitis Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 1661-1665. 34. Edelstein C, Shields CL, De Potter R Shields JA. Complications of Motility Peg Placement for the Hydroxyapatite Orbital Implant. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 1616-1621. 35. Escalona-Benz E, Benz MS, Murray TG, Hayden BC, Hernandez E, et

Next